Proving motive is not mandatory, especially in a homicide case. It could be anything, but most likely a rejected sexual advance. The fragile male ego, especially back then.
Motive is mandatory… otherwise you’re just saying ‘trust the science’ which is a way of saying ‘trust some dude because he has a lab coat or works for the government’
You are a horrible piece of garbage. A seriously shit sub human. I seriously hope you die a painful death soon.
Killing a random person like that, so barbarically, is not normal behaviour for a human. Psychopaths who are very different from us do that. Browns in third world countries do that, with acid and so on. But they are animals literally. Whites do not do that unless they have a severe psychopathy. It’s never simply normal behaviour like it is in India or Pakistan. But you have so much hate in your sick twisted demented soul that you would say such evil as you just did. Because you simply hate all men.
Shame on you and on all sick twisted femenoids like you, you sorry excuse for a subhuman.
Stay away from substack and go vomit your venom elsewhere.
What else did they have? After all the stuff with Yvonne woods and that LA lab tech too,.I don't think DNA is the be-all, end all of you can't establish some other evidence too..
The part that stayed with me: her parents died without ever knowing. Larison finding that DNA in 2006 — 27 years after the fact, with zero prints to work with — and then having to wait another decade for genealogy to catch up with the science... that's the real story here. And Burns being arrested on the 39th anniversary, to the day? History has a strange sense of timing. Well told.
Yes, and the fact that was her brother, could you imagine how her parents would have felt? It’s more than like a blessing that they passed away and never knew.
Not a word about motive
Proving motive is not mandatory, especially in a homicide case. It could be anything, but most likely a rejected sexual advance. The fragile male ego, especially back then.
Motive is mandatory… otherwise you’re just saying ‘trust the science’ which is a way of saying ‘trust some dude because he has a lab coat or works for the government’
I wonder what people will say if it's shown that DNA evidence isn't totally infallible.
You are a horrible piece of garbage. A seriously shit sub human. I seriously hope you die a painful death soon.
Killing a random person like that, so barbarically, is not normal behaviour for a human. Psychopaths who are very different from us do that. Browns in third world countries do that, with acid and so on. But they are animals literally. Whites do not do that unless they have a severe psychopathy. It’s never simply normal behaviour like it is in India or Pakistan. But you have so much hate in your sick twisted demented soul that you would say such evil as you just did. Because you simply hate all men.
Shame on you and on all sick twisted femenoids like you, you sorry excuse for a subhuman.
Stay away from substack and go vomit your venom elsewhere.
What else did they have? After all the stuff with Yvonne woods and that LA lab tech too,.I don't think DNA is the be-all, end all of you can't establish some other evidence too..
The part that stayed with me: her parents died without ever knowing. Larison finding that DNA in 2006 — 27 years after the fact, with zero prints to work with — and then having to wait another decade for genealogy to catch up with the science... that's the real story here. And Burns being arrested on the 39th anniversary, to the day? History has a strange sense of timing. Well told.
Yes, and the fact that was her brother, could you imagine how her parents would have felt? It’s more than like a blessing that they passed away and never knew.
Burns claimed he had never met Michelle Martinko???